Government Performance Measurement
Government performance measurement is the systematic, ongoing collection of quantitative and qualitative indicators about what public agencies put in, do, and achieve. Rather than treating measurement as a single number that grades an agency, the discipline — crystallised by Robert Behn's argument that different managerial purposes require different measures — asks first what a measure is for: evaluating, controlling, budgeting, motivating, promoting, celebrating, learning or improving. It draws heavily on Harry Hatry's practical handbook tradition of distinguishing inputs, outputs and outcomes and building measurement into routine operations. The output is not a verdict but a feedback system that ties day-to-day activity to public results.
Lees de volledige methode
Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.
Methodenkaart
De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.
Bronnen
- Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6210.00322 ↗
- Hatry, H. P. (2006). Performance Measurement: Getting Results (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press. ISBN: 9780877667346
Deze pagina citeren
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Performance Measurement in Government and Public Agencies. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/public-administration/performance-measurement-government
Welke methode?
Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.
- Balanced Scorecard for Public SectorPublic Administration↔ vergelijken
- Government Performance DashboardPublic Administration↔ vergelijken
- Performance-Based BudgetingPublic Administration↔ vergelijken
- Public Sector BenchmarkingPublic Administration↔ vergelijken
Geciteerd door
Vergelijkbare methoden
Een fout op deze pagina gezien? Meld het of stel een correctie voor →