Accountability Mechanism Analysis
Accountability mechanism analysis provides a structured way to identify, describe and evaluate the relationships through which public actors must explain and justify their conduct to others. Mark Bovens, in his 2007 conceptual framework, defines accountability narrowly as a relationship in which an actor has an obligation to render an account of conduct to a forum that can pose questions, pass judgement, and impose consequences. The method first maps these relationships, then classifies them by the type of forum and obligation, and finally assesses them against political, constitutional and learning perspectives. Its purpose is to bring analytical precision to a concept that is otherwise used as a vague synonym for good governance.
Lees de volledige methode
Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.
Methodenkaart
De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.
Bronnen
- Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x ↗
- Bovens, M. (1998). The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521629959
Deze pagina citeren
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Accountability Mechanism Analysis in Public Governance. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/public-administration/accountability-mechanism-analysis
Welke methode?
Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.
- Co-Production AssessmentPublic Administration↔ vergelijken
- Collaborative Governance AssessmentPublic Administration↔ vergelijken
- Principal-Agent Analysis in the Public SectorPublic Administration↔ vergelijken
- Transaction Cost Analysis in the Public SectorPublic Administration↔ vergelijken
Geciteerd door
Vergelijkbare methoden
Een fout op deze pagina gezien? Meld het of stel een correctie voor →