ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineStandard setting

Bookmark Standard Setting

The Bookmark method is an item-response-theory-based standard-setting procedure in which test items are arranged in a booklet ordered from easiest to hardest. Panelists page through this ordered item booklet and place a 'bookmark' at the point separating items a borderline examinee would likely master from those they would not, judged against a fixed response probability (commonly two-thirds). The latent ability at the bookmark defines the cut score. Developed at CTB/McGraw-Hill, it became one of the dominant methods for large-scale K-12 assessments.

Openen in MethodMindBinnenkortToepassen, vergelijken, advies krijgen
Tools & bronnen
Dia's downloaden
Leren & verkennen
VideoBinnenkort

Lees de volledige methode

Alleen voor leden

Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.

Inloggen

Methodenkaart

De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.

Bronnen

  1. Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Sage. ISBN: 9781412916820
  2. Mitzel, H. C., Lewis, D. M., Patz, R. J., & Green, D. R. (2001). The bookmark procedure: Psychological perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting Performance Standards: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives (pp. 249–281). Lawrence Erlbaum. ISBN: 9780805835586

Deze pagina citeren

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Bookmark Method for Setting Performance Standards with Ordered Item Booklets. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/education/bookmark-standard-setting

Welke methode?

Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.

Naast elkaar vergelijken

Geciteerd door

ScholarGateBookmark Standard Setting (Bookmark Method for Setting Performance Standards with Ordered Item Booklets). Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/education/bookmark-standard-setting · Gegevensset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026