Resource Curse Analysis
Resource curse analysis is the empirical study of the paradox that economies rich in natural resources — oil, gas, minerals — often grow more slowly, remain less democratic, and suffer more conflict than resource-poor economies. Jeffrey Sachs and Andrew Warner's influential work, summarized in their 2001 European Economic Review article, documented a robust negative cross-country correlation between resource dependence and economic growth. Michael Ross's 2001 World Politics article extended the logic to politics, showing statistically that oil wealth is associated with weaker democracy through rentier, repression, and modernization mechanisms. The workhorse method is a cross-country regression of growth or democracy on a measure of resource dependence with controls for the standard determinants of development.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). Natural Resources and Economic Development: The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review, 45(4-6), 827-838. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8 ↗
- Ross, M. L. (2001). Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 325-361. DOI: 10.1353/wp.2001.0011 ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Resource Curse Analysis (Natural Resource Dependence and Development). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/political-economy/resource-curse-analysis
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Dependency AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ salīdzināt
- Rent-Seeking AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ salīdzināt
- State Autonomy AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ salīdzināt
Līdzīgas metodes
Saistītie atsauces jēdzieni
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →