ScholarGate
アシスタント
Regression modelTourism marketing / preference measurement

Tourism Product Conjoint Analysis

Tourism product conjoint analysis is a decompositional preference-measurement technique that breaks travellers' overall judgments of holiday packages into the separate contributions, or part-worths, of each package attribute. Building on the conjoint framework articulated by Green and Srinivasan (1978), the method presents respondents with whole travel-package profiles, each combining levels of attributes such as price, trip duration, board basis, accommodation class and included activities, and asks them to rate or rank the packages. From these holistic evaluations it statistically recovers how much each attribute level adds to or subtracts from preference, and how important each attribute is overall. Unlike choice-based methods that model selection among alternatives, traditional ratings-based conjoint treats preference as a quantity to be decomposed, making it a natural tool for designing and optimising tourism products and bundles.

MethodMindで開く近日公開適用、比較、ガイダンスの取得
ツールとリソース
スライドをダウンロード
学習と探索
動画近日公開

手法の全文を読む

会員限定

無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。

ログイン

手法マップ

関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。

出典

  1. Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103-123. DOI: 10.1086/208721
  2. Huybers, T. (2003). Modelling Short-Break Holiday Destination Choices. Tourism Economics, 9(4), 389-405. DOI: 10.5367/000000003322662989

このページの引用方法

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Tourism Product Conjoint Analysis (Part-Worth Decomposition of Travel Package Preferences). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/tourism/tourism-conjoint-analysis

どの手法を選ぶ?

この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。

並べて比較する

この手法を参照する項目

ScholarGateTourism Product Conjoint Analysis (Tourism Product Conjoint Analysis (Part-Worth Decomposition of Travel Package Preferences)). 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/tourism/tourism-conjoint-analysis · データセット: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026