Event History Turnover Analysis
Event history turnover analysis models not just whether employees leave but when they leave, treating tenure as a duration and the act of quitting as an event whose timing carries information. Paul Allison's 1984 monograph brought event history methods — survival and hazard models — into the social sciences with a regression-oriented treatment that handles the censoring inherent in longitudinal data. Morita, Lee, and Mowday's 1993 Academy of Management Journal paper applied these techniques to turnover research, showing organizational scholars how to model the hazard of leaving and why time-to-event methods are superior to simple stayed-versus-left comparisons. The core object is the hazard function, the instantaneous risk of quitting given that one has stayed so far, which can depend on tenure and on employee and job characteristics. Because some employees are still present when the study ends, the analysis must correctly handle censored observations rather than discarding or mis-coding them. The result is a model that explains and predicts the timing of turnover.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Morita, J. G., Lee, T. W., & Mowday, R. T. (1993). The regression-analog to survival analysis: A selected application to turnover research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1430-1464. DOI: 10.5465/256818 ↗
- Allison, P. D. (1984). Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Sage Publications (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 46). ISBN: 9780803920552
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Event History Turnover Analysis (Survival and Hazard Models of Employee Turnover). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/organizational-behavior/event-history-turnover-analysis
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Organizational Identification Scale組織行動論↔ 比較
- Organizational Network Analysis組織行動論↔ 比較
- Psychological Empowerment Scale組織行動論↔ 比較