ScholarGate
アシスタント
Process / pipelineScholarly communication / citation studies

Reference Accuracy Study

A reference accuracy study verifies the references in published work against their sources to estimate how often citations are wrong, distinguishing bibliographic errors (mistakes in author, title, year, volume, or pages) from quotation errors (cases where the cited source does not actually support the claim attributed to it). The method draws a sample of references, checks each one against the original document, and reports error rates as proportions with confidence intervals, often classifying errors by severity. Such studies have repeatedly found troubling rates: reviews of medical research, synthesized by Mogull (2017), put the quotation error rate near 14.5 percent, and Smith and Cumberledge (2020) found substantial quotation errors even in general science journals. For libraries and editors, these studies justify citation-checking services and reference-verification workflows.

MethodMindで開く近日公開適用、比較、ガイダンスの取得
ツールとリソース
スライドをダウンロード
学習と探索
動画近日公開

手法の全文を読む

会員限定

無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。

ログイン

手法マップ

関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。

出典

  1. Mogull, S. A. (2017). Accuracy of cited "facts" in medical research articles: A review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184727. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184727
  2. Smith, N., & Cumberledge, A. (2020). Quotation errors in general science journals. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 476(2242), 20200538. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0538

このページの引用方法

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Reference Accuracy Study (Citation and Quotation Error Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/library-information-science/reference-accuracy-study

どの手法を選ぶ?

この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。

並べて比較する

この手法を参照する項目

ScholarGateReference Accuracy Study (Reference Accuracy Study (Citation and Quotation Error Analysis)). 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/library-information-science/reference-accuracy-study · データセット: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026