ScholarGate
アシスタント
Process / pipelineLibrary & information science / cataloguing quality

Bibliographic Record Quality Analysis

Bibliographic record quality analysis evaluates the catalogue records that describe library resources — typically MARC or linked-data records built to standards such as RDA — to determine how well they serve their purpose. Philip Hider's account of information resource description frames quality in terms of accuracy, completeness, consistency, and conformance to cataloguing rules, while Elaine Svenonius's objectives of the catalogue — to find, identify, select, and obtain resources — supply the functional yardstick against which records are ultimately judged. The analysis samples records, scores them on each quality criterion, checks their encoding and content against the relevant standard, and asks whether they actually let users carry out the catalogue's core tasks. The result is evidence about where cataloguing is strong, where it fails, and what remediation or policy change is needed.

MethodMindで開く近日公開適用、比較、ガイダンスの取得
ツールとリソース
スライドをダウンロード
学習と探索
動画近日公開

手法の全文を読む

会員限定

無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。

ログイン

手法マップ

関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。

出典

  1. Hider, P. (2018). Information Resource Description: Creating and Managing Metadata (2nd ed.). London: Facet Publishing. ISBN: 9781783302239
  2. Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262194334

このページの引用方法

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Bibliographic Record Quality Analysis (Evaluating Catalogue Records Against Functional Objectives). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/library-information-science/bibliographic-record-quality-analysis

どの手法を選ぶ?

この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。

並べて比較する

この手法を参照する項目

ScholarGateBibliographic Record Quality Analysis (Bibliographic Record Quality Analysis (Evaluating Catalogue Records Against Functional Objectives)). 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/library-information-science/bibliographic-record-quality-analysis · データセット: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026