ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineGovernance and collaboration network analysis

Network Governance Analysis

Network governance analysis studies how public problems are addressed not by single hierarchical agencies but by networks of interdependent organizations — government bodies, nonprofits, firms and community groups — coordinating to deliver services or make policy. It combines the relational tools of social network analysis with Keith Provan and Patrick Kenis's influential 2008 typology of network governance, which distinguishes shared (participant-governed) networks, lead-organization-governed networks, and network administrative organizations. By mapping the structure of ties, computing network metrics, classifying the governance mode and relating these to outcomes, the method explains how a collaborative network is held together and why it performs as it does.

Otvorite u MethodMindUskoroPrimijenite, usporedite, dobijte smjernice
Alati i resursi
Preuzmi prezentaciju
Učenje i istraživanje
VideoUskoro

Pročitajte cijelu metodu

Samo za članove

Prijavite se besplatnim računom kako biste pročitali ovaj odjeljak.

Prijavite se

Karta metoda

Okruženje srodnih metoda — odaberite čvor za istraživanje.

Izvori

  1. Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum015

Kako citirati ovu stranicu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Analysis of Network Governance in the Public Sector. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hr/public-administration/network-governance-analysis

Koja metoda?

Postavite ovu metodu uz njoj najsrodnije i pročitajte ih jednu uz drugu — knjižnica vam knjige stavlja na stol; izbor je na vama.

Usporedi jedno uz drugo

Citirana u

ScholarGateNetwork Governance Analysis (Analysis of Network Governance in the Public Sector). Preuzeto 2026-06-24 s https://scholargate.app/hr/public-administration/network-governance-analysis · Skup podataka: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026