Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)
Probabilistic Risk Assessment is the comprehensive, quantitative method for analyzing risk in complex engineered systems by answering three questions: what can go wrong, how likely is it, and how bad would it be. Kaplan and Garrick's 1981 paper gave the field its enduring definition of risk as a set of triplets — scenario, frequency, and consequence — and showed how to extend that definition to incorporate uncertainty through probability distributions. The NASA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide (NASA/SP-2011-3421) operationalizes this framework for high-consequence aerospace systems, combining initiating-event analysis, event trees and fault trees, consequence modeling, and formal uncertainty propagation into an integrated assessment. Unlike qualitative hazard identification, PRA produces a quantified risk picture — typically a frequency-of-exceedance curve with explicit uncertainty bounds — that supports decisions about where scarce safety resources will reduce risk most.
مطالعهٔ کامل روش
برای خواندن این بخش با حساب رایگان وارد شوید.
نقشهٔ روش
همسایگی روشهای مرتبط — برای کاوش، یک گره را برگزینید.
منابع
- Stamatelatos, M., Dezfuli, H., et al. (2011). Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practitioners (2nd ed.), NASA/SP-2011-3421. NASA, Washington, DC. link ↗
- Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On The Quantitative Definition of Risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x ↗
نحوهٔ استناد به این صفحه
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) — Scenario-Frequency-Consequence Quantification. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fa/disaster-studies/probabilistic-risk-assessment
کدام روش؟
این روش را در کنار نزدیکترین روشهای خویشاوندش بگذارید و آنها را کنار هم بخوانید — کتابخانه کتابها را روی میز میگشاید؛ انتخاب با شماست.
- تحلیل درخت رویداد (ETA)قابلیت اطمینان↔ مقایسه
- تحلیل درخت خطا (FTA)قابلیت اطمینان↔ مقایسه
- Multi-Hazard Risk AssessmentDisaster Studies↔ مقایسه
ارجاعشده در
روشهای مشابه
در این صفحه مشکلی دیدید؟ گزارش دهید یا اصلاحی پیشنهاد کنید →