Dynamic Panel Models in Politics
Dynamic panel models for political science analyze time-series cross-section (TSCS) data — repeated observations on countries, dyads, states, or other units over many years — where the outcome today depends on its own past. By including a lagged dependent variable alongside unit fixed effects, these models capture persistence and inertia common in comparative politics and international relations, but doing so introduces the Nickell bias. Estimators such as Arellano-Bond and system GMM, and design choices such as Beck-Katz panel-corrected standard errors, were developed to recover credible dynamic estimates from such data.
Loe meetodi täielikku kirjeldust
Selle osa lugemiseks logi sisse tasuta kontoga.
Meetodikaart
Seotud meetodite ümbruskond — vali sõlm, et seda uurida.
Allikad
- Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. DOI: 10.2307/2082979 ↗
- Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. DOI: 10.2307/2297968 ↗
Kuidas sellele lehele viidata
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Dynamic Panel Models for Political Science (Lagged Dependent Variable Panels). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/et/political-science/dynamic-panel-politics
Milline meetod?
Aseta see meetod oma lähimate sugulaste kõrvale ja loe neid kõrvuti — raamatukogu laob raamatud lauale; valik on sinu.
- Arellano-Bongi GMM-hinnangÖkonomeetria↔ võrdle
- Dünaamiline paneelmudelÖkonomeetria↔ võrdle
- Paneelandmete analüüsÖkonomeetria↔ võrdle
- Süsteem GMM (Arellano-Bover / Blundell-Bond)Ökonomeetria↔ võrdle
Sarnased meetodid
Seotud viitemõisted
Märkasid sellel lehel viga? Teata sellest või paku parandust →