ScholarGate
Asistente
Process / pipelineTransport equity / accessibility evaluation

Accessibility Equity Analysis

Accessibility equity analysis asks not just how much access to opportunities a place has, but how that access is distributed across people and social groups — who can reach jobs, healthcare, and education, and who is left behind. It pairs an accessibility measure, in the tradition formalized by Karst Geurs and Bert van Wee, with the distributional tools of inequality measurement: Lorenz curves, Gini and Palma indices, and comparisons between advantaged and disadvantaged groups. The result reframes accessibility as a question of fairness, revealing whether a transport or land-use arrangement concentrates reachable opportunity among the already privileged or spreads it equitably.

Abrir en MethodMindPróximamenteAplicar, comparar, obtener orientación
Herramientas y recursos
Descargar diapositivas
Aprender y explorar
VídeoPróximamente

Leer el método completo

Solo para miembros

Inicia sesión con una cuenta gratuita para leer esta sección.

Iniciar sesión

Mapa de métodos

El vecindario de métodos relacionados: selecciona un nodo para explorarlo.

Fuentes

  1. Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005

Cómo citar esta página

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Accessibility Equity Analysis (Distributional Assessment of Access to Opportunities). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/es/urban-studies/accessibility-equity-analysis

¿Qué método?

Coloca este método junto a sus parientes más cercanos y léelos lado a lado: la biblioteca pone los libros sobre la mesa; la elección es tuya.

Comparar lado a lado

Citado por

ScholarGateAccessibility Equity Analysis (Accessibility Equity Analysis (Distributional Assessment of Access to Opportunities)). Recuperado el 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/es/urban-studies/accessibility-equity-analysis · Conjunto de datos: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026