Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Neuroimaging›Tract-Based Spatial Statistics
Process / pipelineVoxel-wise spatial analysis

Tract-Based Spatial Statistics

Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) · Also known as: TBSS, white matter skeleton analysis

Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) is a voxel-wise analysis method for detecting group differences in white matter microstructure from diffusion MRI data. Published by Stephen M. Smith and colleagues in 2006, TBSS addresses registration and multiple comparison problems inherent in voxel-wise analysis by projecting individual FA maps onto a white matter skeleton derived from a population template.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Tract-Based Spatial Statistics
Diffusion Kurtosis Imagi…NODDIVoxel-Based MorphometryMagnetisation Transfer R…

When to use it

TBSS is ideal for group studies comparing white matter integrity between populations, when sample sizes are moderate to large (20+ per group), and when interest is in FA or other diffusion metrics. TBSS is less suitable for single-case clinical assessment or when the primary focus is on specific named tracts (alternative: ROI-based approaches). Avoid TBSS if subject motion is severe or structural pathology is extensive.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Reduces alignment uncertainty by focusing on the white matter skeleton, the most anatomically consistent region
  • Improves statistical power by increasing the proportion of voxels that are truly homologous across subjects
  • Addresses multiple comparison problem more efficiently than standard voxel-wise analysis
  • Easily accommodates multiple metrics (FA, MD, AD, RD) in a unified framework
  • Robust to subtle differences in brain size and shape across subjects
Limitations
  • Skeleton projection may miss group differences at the periphery of white matter bundles
  • Still requires successful registration across all subjects; pathological brains may not register well to template
  • Less sensitive to crossing fibers and regions with complex architecture (e.g., internal capsule)
  • Interpretation limited to scalar metrics (FA, MD); does not model fiber direction or connectivity

Frequently asked

What is the white matter skeleton, and why is it important?

The skeleton is the medial core of white matter bundles, representing voxels present in most subjects after registration. It is the most anatomically consistent region across subjects, reducing registration error and improving statistical power. The skeleton approach is TBSS's key innovation.

Which diffusion metric should I analyze with TBSS?

Fractional anisotropy (FA) is most commonly used and most robust. Mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) can also be analyzed. Choose based on your hypothesis: FA captures overall white matter integrity, RD suggests demyelination, and AD reflects axonal damage.

How do I choose the skeleton threshold?

Threshold is usually set to include voxels with FA > 0.2 in the population mean FA map. This threshold is a compromise: it includes most white matter while excluding gray matter and CSF. Sensitivity analysis around this value can test robustness.

Can TBSS handle patient groups with brain lesions?

TBSS registration can be problematic if pathology causes large distortions (e.g., tumors, infarcts). Consider masking lesions during registration or using lesion-avoiding registration tools. For severe pathology, ROI-based or tract-specific approaches may be more reliable.

Sources

  1. Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Johansen-Berg, H., et al. (2006). Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. NeuroImage, 31(4), 1487–1505. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 ↗
  2. Winkler, A. M., Ridgway, G. R., Webster, M. A., Smith, S. M., & Nichols, T. E. (2014). Permutation inference for the general linear model. NeuroImage, 92, 381–397. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/neuroimaging/tract-based-spatial-statistics

Related methods

Diffusion Kurtosis ImagingNODDIVoxel-Based Morphometry

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Diffusion Kurtosis ImagingNeuroimaging↔ compare
  • NODDINeuroimaging↔ compare
  • Voxel-Based MorphometryNeuroimaging↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Diffusion Kurtosis ImagingMagnetisation Transfer RatioNODDIVoxel-Based Morphometry

Similar methods

DTI TractographyNODDIVoxel-Based MorphometryDiffusion Kurtosis ImagingGraph Brain Network AnalysisMagnetisation Transfer RatioDynamic Causal ModelingQuantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Related reference concepts

White Matter Tracts and ConnectivityStructural and Functional NeuroimagingWhite Matter Pathways and TractsNeuroanatomy and NeuroimagingStereotactic Reference Frames and AtlasesCerebral White Matter Tracts and Association Fibers

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/neuroimaging/tract-based-spatial-statistics · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Stephen M. Smith
Subfamily
Voxel-wise spatial analysis
Year
2006
Type
Diffusion MRI white matter analysis pipeline
Related methods
Diffusion Kurtosis ImagingNODDIVoxel-Based Morphometry
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account