Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Z-Number Preference Ranking Organization Method (II)
MCDMRankingZ number

Z-Number Preference Ranking Organization Method (II)

Z-PROMETHEE (Z-Number Preference Ranking Organization Method (II)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Mahammad Nuriyev (Khazar University, Baku, Azerbaijan); builds on Brans-Vincke 1985 PROMETHEE in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Z-PROMETHEE
AHPBWMCRITICENTROPYMERECSWARAZ-AHPZ-BWMZF-LMAW

When to use it

Z-PROMETHEE outputs alternative net flows Φ(a). Higher Φ = better alternative. Φ ranges roughly within [−(m−1), (m−1)] though practical values are smaller. Inspect Φ+ (strengths) and Φ− (weaknesses) for interpretation beyond final rank.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Results depend on the chosen normalisation, weights, and parameter settings.

Sources

  1. Nuriyev, M. (2020). Z-numbers Based Hybrid MCDM Approach for Energy Resources Ranking and Selection. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.9950 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Z-Number Preference Ranking Organization Method (II). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/z-promethee

Related methods

AHPBWMCRITICENTROPYMERECSWARAZ-AHPZ-BWM

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
  • ENTROPYDecision-making↔ compare
  • MERECDecision-making↔ compare
  • SWARADecision-making↔ compare
  • Z-AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • Z-BWMDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Z-AHPZF-LMAW

Similar methods

Z-AHPPROMETHEE-IIPROMETHEEPROMETHEE-IZ-TOPSISPROMETHEE-IIIN-PROMETHEEZ-BWM

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingDecision Support SystemsCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyWeighted ScoresDecision Making SkillsQ Methodology

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Z-PROMETHEE (Z-Number Preference Ranking Organization Method (II)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/z-promethee · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Mahammad Nuriyev (Khazar University, Baku, Azerbaijan); builds on Brans-Vincke 1985 PROMETHEE
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2020
Type
Outranking method with Z-number uncertainty (PROMETHEE II — full ranking)
Value Space
Z number
Uncertainty
hybrid
Compensation
partial
Related methods
AHPBWMCRITICENTROPYMERECSWARAZ-AHPZ-BWM
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account