Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations
MCDMOutrankingcrisp

PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations

PROMETHEE (PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

PROMETHEE
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITICAHP-BOCRCONDORCET

+8 more

When to use it

φ(a) ∈ [−1, 1]. Higher net flow φ means stronger overall preference. φ⁺ measures how much a is preferred over all others (leaving flow); φ⁻ measures how much others are preferred over a (entering flow). PROMETHEE I (partial ranking) uses (φ⁺, φ⁻) and allows incomparability. PROMETHEE II (complete ranking) uses net flow φ alone. Choice of preference function type and thresholds strongly affects results — select them with care based on criterion nature.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.

Sources

  1. Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/promethee

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

AHP-BOCRCONDORCETData-Driven MCDADODGSONFLOWSORTFUZZY-PROMETHEEOrdinal Priority ApproachPROMETHEE-GAIAPROMETHEE-VPROMETHEE-VI

Similar methods

PROMETHEE-IIPROMETHEE-IPROMETHEE-IIIPROMETHEE-VPROMETHEE-VIIF-PROMETHEEZ-PROMETHEEFUZZY-PROMETHEE

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingDecision Support SystemsDelphi TechniqueParticipative Decision MakingDecision Making SkillsQ Methodology

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — PROMETHEE (PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/promethee · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B.
Subfamily
Outranking
Year
1986
Type
Preference function (net flow)
Value Space
crisp
Uncertainty
None
Compensation
partial
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account