Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›PROMETHEE I — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations I (partial ranking)
MCDMRankingcrisp

PROMETHEE I — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations I (partial ranking)

PROMETHEE-I (PROMETHEE I — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations I (partial ranking)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

PROMETHEE-I
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITICFLOWSORTPROMETHEE-V

+1 more

When to use it

PROMETHEE I produces a partial preorder: A_i outranks A_k (aPb) if φ⁺_i > φ⁺_k AND φ⁻_i < φ⁻_k. A_i and A_k are indifferent (aIb) if φ⁺_i = φ⁺_k AND φ⁻_i = φ⁻_k. Otherwise they are incomparable (aRb). For a complete ranking use PROMETHEE II (net flow φ = φ⁺ − φ⁻).

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.

Sources

  1. Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). PROMETHEE I — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations I (partial ranking). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/promethee-i

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

FLOWSORTPROMETHEE-VPROMETHEE-VI

Similar methods

PROMETHEEPROMETHEE-IIPROMETHEE-IIIPROMETHEE-VIPROMETHEE-VIF-PROMETHEEEXPROM-IZ-PROMETHEE

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingDecision Support SystemsParticipative Decision MakingDelphi TechniqueDecision Making SkillsQ Methodology

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — PROMETHEE-I (PROMETHEE I — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations I (partial ranking)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/promethee-i · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
1986
Type
Outranking via positive/negative flows (partial preorder)
Value Space
crisp
Uncertainty
None
Compensation
partial
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account