Resource Curse Analysis
Resource curse analysis is the empirical study of the paradox that economies rich in natural resources — oil, gas, minerals — often grow more slowly, remain less democratic, and suffer more conflict than resource-poor economies. Jeffrey Sachs and Andrew Warner's influential work, summarized in their 2001 European Economic Review article, documented a robust negative cross-country correlation between resource dependence and economic growth. Michael Ross's 2001 World Politics article extended the logic to politics, showing statistically that oil wealth is associated with weaker democracy through rentier, repression, and modernization mechanisms. The workhorse method is a cross-country regression of growth or democracy on a measure of resource dependence with controls for the standard determinants of development.
Læs hele metoden
Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.
Metodekort
Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.
Kilder
- Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). Natural Resources and Economic Development: The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review, 45(4-6), 827-838. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8 ↗
- Ross, M. L. (2001). Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 325-361. DOI: 10.1353/wp.2001.0011 ↗
Sådan citerer du denne side
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Resource Curse Analysis (Natural Resource Dependence and Development). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/political-economy/resource-curse-analysis
Hvilken metode?
Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.
- Dependency AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ sammenlign
- Rent-Seeking AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ sammenlign
- State Autonomy AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ sammenlign
Lignende metoder
Har du fundet en fejl på denne side? Indberet den eller foreslå en rettelse →