ScholarGate
المساعد
Process / pipelineActuarial risk assessment

Child Welfare Risk Assessment

Child welfare risk assessment estimates the likelihood that a child will be maltreated in the future, in order to guide decisions about case opening, service intensity, and ongoing monitoring. Actuarial systems — the most validated form, advanced by Christopher Baird, Dennis Wagner, and colleagues — score a small set of empirically weighted case characteristics into a risk level that statistically predicts future maltreatment, and have been shown to outperform consensus-based clinical judgment in reliability and predictive validity. Risk assessment is distinct from, and complementary to, the safety assessment that addresses immediate danger.

افتح في MethodMindقريبًاطبّق، قارن، واحصل على إرشادات
الأدوات والموارد
تنزيل الشرائح
التعلّم والاستكشاف
فيديوقريبًا

اقرأ الطريقة كاملة

للأعضاء فقط

سجّل الدخول بحساب مجاني لقراءة هذا القسم.

تسجيل الدخول

خريطة المناهج

محيط المناهج ذات الصلة — اختر عقدةً للاستكشاف.

المصادر

  1. Baird, C., & Wagner, D. (2000). The relative validity of actuarial- and consensus-based risk assessment systems. Children and Youth Services Review, 22(11–12), 839–871. DOI: 10.1016/S0190-7409(00)00122-5
  2. Shlonsky, A., & Wagner, D. (2005). The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(4), 409–427. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.11.007

كيف تستشهد بهذه الصفحة

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Actuarial and Consensus Risk Assessment in Child Welfare. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ar/social-work/child-welfare-risk-assessment

أيُّ منهج؟

ضع هذا المنهج إلى جانب أقرب نظائره واقرأهما جنباً إلى جنب — المكتبة تضع الكتب على الطاولة، والاختيار لك.

قارن جنباً إلى جنب

يُستشهد بها في

ScholarGateChild Welfare Risk Assessment (Actuarial and Consensus Risk Assessment in Child Welfare). استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-24 من https://scholargate.app/ar/social-work/child-welfare-risk-assessment · مجموعة البيانات: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026