Process / pipelineNetwork structure / organizational hierarchy
Krackhardt Hierarchy Measures
Krackhardt's graph-theoretic dimensions provide four indices that together measure how closely a directed network approximates a pure hierarchy — formally, an out-tree. The dimensions are connectedness (is everyone linked?), hierarchy (are ties asymmetric, i.e., non-reciprocated?), efficiency (are there no redundant ties?), and least upper bound (does every pair share a common superior?). Each is scaled from 0 to 1, and a network scoring 1 on all four is a perfect hierarchy.
在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
学习与探索
视频即将推出
阅读完整方法
仅限会员
登录使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Krackhardt, D. (1994). Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. In K. M. Carley & M. J. Prietula (Eds.), Computational Organization Theory (pp. 89–111). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: 10.4324/9781315806648-5 ↗
- Everett, M. G., & Krackhardt, D. (2012). A second look at Krackhardt's graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. Social Networks, 34(2), 159–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.10.006 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Krackhardt's Graph-Theoretic Dimensions of Hierarchy. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/sociology/krackhardt-hierarchy
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Core-Periphery AnalysisSociology↔ 比较
- E-I IndexSociology↔ 比较
- Generalized BlockmodelingSociology↔ 比较
- 社会网络分析网络分析↔ 比较
- Structural Holes AnalysisSociology↔ 比较