Process / pipelineReview / evidence synthesis
基于网络的间接比较——同时比较多种治疗方法
基于网络的间接比较（NMA）通过同时综合网络中两个或多个竞争性疗法之间的证据，扩展了传统的两两间接比较。这包括在单一试验中从未进行过头对头比较的配对。通过在连贯的统计模型中结合直接和间接证据，NMA能够为所有治疗配对产生相对效应估计值，并生成一个概率性排名，以确定哪种治疗在感兴趣的结果上表现最佳。
阅读完整方法
仅限会员
登录使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
来源
- Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1201 ↗
- Salanti, G. (2012). Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Research Synthesis Methods, 3(2), 80–97. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1037 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Network-based Meta-analysis (Network Meta-Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/scientometrics/network-based-meta-analysis
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- 文献计量分析科学计量学↔ compare
- 网络荟萃分析证据综合↔ compare
- 范围界定审查科学计量学↔ compare
- 系统性文献综述科学计量学↔ compare
- Umbrella Review证据综合↔ compare