方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于网络的间接比较× | 网络荟萃分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 科学计量学 | 证据综合 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2002 (Lumley); refined 2008–2012 | 2002 |
| 提出者≠ | Thomas Lumley (statistical framework); Georgia Salanti (SUCRA and ranking methods) | Lumley (2002) |
| 类型≠ | Quantitative evidence synthesis | Method |
| 开创性文献 | Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗ | Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | NMA, network meta-analysis, mixed-treatment comparison, multiple-treatments meta-analysis | Mixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 1 |
| 摘要≠ | Network-based Meta-analysis (NMA) extends conventional pairwise meta-analysis by simultaneously synthesizing evidence across a network of two or more competing treatments, including pairs that have never been compared head-to-head in a single trial. By combining direct and indirect evidence within a coherent statistical model, NMA produces relative effect estimates for all treatment pairs and generates a probabilistic ranking of which treatment performs best on the outcome of interest. | Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|