Process / pipelinetrustworthiness-assurance
成员核查(Member Checking)与参与者验证
成员核查是定性研究中的一项质量保证程序,研究者将初步发现、解释或分析主题与研究参与者分享,并询问这些发现是否准确反映了他们的观点和经历。成员核查由 Lincoln and Guba (1985) 提出,作为可信度(trustworthiness)标准之一,被认为是确保研究可信度和减少研究者误读的关键方法。其目标是核实研究者是否正确理解了参与者,以及解释是否基于参与者实际的意义建构,而非研究者自身的假设。成员核查可以在研究的不同阶段进行(如个体访谈后、初步分析后或草稿发现写成后),并采取不同形式(个体反馈、小组验证、互动讨论)。
阅读完整方法
仅限会员
登录使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
来源
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314
- Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802-1811. DOI: 10.1177/1049732316654870 ↗
- Carlson, J. A. (2010). Avoiding traps in member checking. The Qualitative Report, 15(5), 1102-1113. link ↗
- Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 4). Participant Verification of Qualitative Findings. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/qualitative-research/member-checking
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- 深度访谈法质性研究↔ compare
- Participant Observation质性研究↔ compare
- 定性研究中的反思性质性研究↔ compare
- 可信度标准在定性研究中的应用质性研究↔ compare