ScholarGate
助手
Latent structureScale / measurement

nomological validity

nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure.

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出视频即将推出Download slides

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

来源

  1. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI: 10.1037/h0040957
  2. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI: 10.1037/h0046016

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Nomological Validity. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/psychometrics/nomological-validity

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

被引用于

ScholarGateNomological Validity (Nomological Validity). 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/psychometrics/nomological-validity · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026