Causal Mediation Analysis in Politics
Causal mediation analysis decomposes the effect of a treatment — often a randomized experimental manipulation, such as a campaign message or an information treatment — into the part transmitted through a specified intermediate variable, the mediator, and the part operating through all other pathways. Formalized in the potential-outcomes framework by Imai, Keele, Tingley, and Yamamoto, it defines the average causal mediation effect (ACME) and the average direct effect, makes explicit the sequential-ignorability assumption required to identify them, and supplies a sensitivity analysis for when that assumption fails. It lets political scientists move beyond 'does the treatment work?' to 'why does it work?'
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334. DOI: 10.1037/a0020761 ↗
- Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 765–789. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055411000414 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Causal Mediation Analysis in Political Science (Direct and Indirect Effects of Treatments). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/political-science/causal-mediation-analysis-politics
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- 因果中介分析(自然直接效应和自然间接效应)因果推断↔ 比较
- 动态面板数据模型计量经济学↔ 比较
- 中介分析统计学↔ 比较
- 多层模型研究统计学↔ 比较
- Survey ExperimentPolitical Science↔ 比较