方法对比

	Affective Polarization Measurement	Feeling Thermometer Analysis
领域	政治心理学	政治心理学
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	2012	1964
提出者	Shanto Iyengar, Gaurav Sood & Yphtach Lelkes	American National Election Studies / Aage Clausen
类型	Composite survey index	Affect rating instrument
开创性文献	Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431.	Wilcox, C., Sigelman, L., & Cook, E. (1989). Some like it hot: Individual differences in responses to group feeling thermometers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), 246-257.
别名	Affective Polarization Index, Partisan Affect Gap, Thermometer Difference Measure	Feeling Thermometer, Affect Thermometer, Thermometer Rating Scale
相关	4	4
摘要	Affective polarization measurement quantifies the gap between how positively people feel toward their own political party (the in-party) and how negatively they feel toward the opposing party (the out-party). Iyengar, Sood and Lelkes (2012) showed that this affective divide has grown sharply even where issue positions have not, reframing polarization as a social-identity phenomenon of partisan like and dislike rather than ideological distance.	The feeling thermometer is a survey instrument that asks respondents to rate their warmth or favorability toward a person, group, or institution on a 0-to-100 scale, where 0 is very cold/unfavorable, 100 is very warm/favorable, and 50 is neutral. Introduced in the American National Election Studies in the 1960s, it is the standard measure of political affect, and its analysis underpins candidate evaluation, group affect, and affective-polarization research.