ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineNormalization indicators / research evaluation

Field-Normalized Citation Impact (MNCS)

The Mean Normalized Citation Score (MNCS) is the field-normalized citation impact indicator developed at the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) in Leiden and articulated in Waltman and colleagues' 2011 paper on a new crown indicator. Raw citation counts cannot be compared across fields, because a molecular biology paper and a mathematics paper accumulate citations at vastly different rates, and older papers have had more time to be cited. The MNCS removes these distortions by dividing each paper's citations by the average citations of comparable papers in the same field, document type, and publication year, then averaging these normalized ratios. A value of 1 means performance exactly at the world average for the relevant fields, while values above or below 1 indicate above- or below-average impact.

用 Lacuna 应用即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
下载幻灯片
学习与探索
视频即将推出

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2011). Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 37-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.08.001
  2. Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381-422. DOI: 10.1007/BF02017338

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Field-Normalized Citation Impact (Mean Normalized Citation Score). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/bibliometrics/field-normalized-citation-impact

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateField-Normalized Citation Impact (MNCS) (Field-Normalized Citation Impact (Mean Normalized Citation Score)). 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/bibliometrics/field-normalized-citation-impact · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026