Lawshe Content Validity Ratio
The Lawshe content validity ratio (CVR) is a simple, quantitative method for judging whether the items of a test or measure actually represent the content they are meant to cover, based on the agreement of a panel of subject-matter experts. Charles Lawshe introduced it in 1975 to address a gap in personnel testing: content validity had long been treated as a matter of judgment with no number attached, leaving practitioners unable to defend item retention decisions objectively. Lawshe's insight was to ask experts a focused question, is this item essential, useful but not essential, or not necessary, and to convert the proportion who call an item essential into a ratio that ranges from minus one to plus one. Items whose CVR exceeds a critical value tied to panel size are retained, and the average CVR of retained items gives a content validity index for the whole instrument. The method's clarity made it a durable standard in test development. It is especially common in human resources, nursing, and health-measure validation.
Leia o método completo
Entre com uma conta gratuita para ler esta seção.
Mapa de métodos
A vizinhança de métodos relacionados — selecione um nó para explorar.
Fontes
- Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x ↗
Como citar esta página
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Lawshe Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pt/organizational-behavior/lawshe-content-validity-ratio
Qual método?
Coloque este método ao lado dos seus pares mais próximos e leia-os lado a lado — a biblioteca dispõe os livros sobre a mesa; a escolha é sua.
- Behaviorally Anchored Rating ScalesComportamento organizacional↔ comparar
- Critical Incident TechniqueComportamento organizacional↔ comparar
- Situational Judgment TestComportamento organizacional↔ comparar
Métodos semelhantes
Conceitos de referência relacionados
Encontrou um problema nesta página? Relate ou sugira uma correção →