Controversy Mapping
Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
Przeczytaj pełny opis metody
Zaloguj się na bezpłatne konto, aby przeczytać tę sekcję.
Mapa metod
Sąsiedztwo pokrewnych metod — wybierz węzeł, aby je zgłębić.
Źródła
- Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509102694 ↗
- Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558 ↗
Jak cytować tę stronę
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pl/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping
Która metoda?
Zestaw tę metodę z najbliższymi jej krewnymi i czytaj je obok siebie — biblioteka kładzie księgi na stole; wybór należy do Ciebie.
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ porównaj
- Boundary-Work AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ porównaj
- Social Construction of TechnologyScience Technology Studies↔ porównaj
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ porównaj
Cytowana przez
Podobne metody
Widzisz błąd na tej stronie? Zgłoś go lub zaproponuj poprawkę →