Boundary-Work Analysis
Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.
Przeczytaj pełny opis metody
Zaloguj się na bezpłatne konto, aby przeczytać tę sekcję.
Mapa metod
Sąsiedztwo pokrewnych metod — wybierz węzeł, aby je zgłębić.
Źródła
- Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325 ↗
- Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625
Jak cytować tę stronę
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pl/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis
Która metoda?
Zestaw tę metodę z najbliższymi jej krewnymi i czytaj je obok siebie — biblioteka kładzie księgi na stole; wybór należy do Ciebie.
- Controversy MappingScience Technology Studies↔ porównaj
- Laboratory EthnographyScience Technology Studies↔ porównaj
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ porównaj
- Technological Frames AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ porównaj
Cytowana przez
Podobne metody
Widzisz błąd na tej stronie? Zgłoś go lub zaproponuj poprawkę →