Upper Echelons (TMT) Analysis
Upper echelons analysis tests the proposition that organizations become reflections of their top managers: that the strategic choices a firm makes and the performance it achieves can be partly predicted from the observable characteristics of its top management team. Hambrick and Mason's 1984 Academy of Management Review article launched this perspective, arguing that because executives act on their construed view of complex situations, their experiences, values, and personalities shape outcomes — and that hard-to-measure cognitions can be proxied by observable traits such as age, tenure, functional background, and education. Hambrick's 2007 update sharpened the theory, emphasizing managerial discretion and executive job demands as the conditions under which executive characteristics matter most. The analysis links team demography to strategy and performance.
Les hele metoden
Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.
Metodekart
Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.
Kilder
- Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 ↗
- Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.24345254 ↗
Slik siterer du denne siden
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Upper Echelons (Top Management Team) Analysis of Strategy and Performance. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/strategic-management/upper-echelons-analysis
Hvilken metode?
Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.
- Board Interlock Network AnalysisStrategisk ledelse↔ sammenlign
- Diversification-Performance Analysis (Rumelt Categories)Strategisk ledelse↔ sammenlign
- Merger and Acquisition Performance Event StudyStrategisk ledelse↔ sammenlign
Referert av
Lignende metoder
Funnet en feil på denne siden? Rapporter eller foreslå en rettelse →