ScholarGate
Assistent
MCDMGame-theoretic / formal IR

Crisis Bargaining Game

A crisis bargaining game is a formal, usually extensive-form model in which two states sequentially choose to challenge, escalate, stand firm, or back down during an international dispute, and the analyst solves for the equilibrium pattern of escalation and concession. Building on Schelling's strategy of conflict and given an influential treatment in Fearon's (1994) model of escalation as a war of attrition, these games make explicit how incomplete information about each side's resolve, and the costs each pays for backing down, shape whether a crisis ends in mutual accommodation, capitulation, or war.

Åpne i MethodMindSnartBruk, sammenlign, få veiledning
Verktøy og ressurser
Last ned lysbilder
Lær og utforsk
VideoSnart

Les hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.

Logg inn

Metodekart

Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.

Kilder

  1. Fearon, J. D. (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577–592. DOI: 10.2307/2944796

Slik siterer du denne siden

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Game-Theoretic Models of International Crisis Bargaining. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/international-relations/crisis-bargaining-game

Hvilken metode?

Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.

Sammenlign side om side

Referert av

ScholarGateCrisis Bargaining Game (Game-Theoretic Models of International Crisis Bargaining). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/no/international-relations/crisis-bargaining-game · Datasett: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026