Bargaining Model of War
The bargaining model of war, given its canonical statement by James Fearon in 'Rationalist Explanations for War' (1995), treats war not as the failure of reason but as a failure of bargaining. Because fighting is costly and uncertain, there almost always exists a peaceful division of the disputed stakes that both rational states would prefer to the gamble of war. The puzzle, and the model's central contribution, is to identify the specific conditions — private information with incentives to misrepresent, commitment problems, and issue indivisibility — under which rational, unitary states nonetheless fail to reach such a settlement.
Les hele metoden
Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.
Metodekart
Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.
Kilder
- Fearon, J. D. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(3), 379–414. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300033324 ↗
Slik siterer du denne siden
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Rationalist Bargaining Model of War (Fearon). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/international-relations/bargaining-model-of-war
Hvilken metode?
Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.
- Audience Cost AnalysisInternational Relations↔ sammenlign
- Crisis Bargaining GameInternational Relations↔ sammenlign
- Expected Utility Model of WarInternational Relations↔ sammenlign
Referert av
Lignende metoder
Funnet en feil på denne siden? Rapporter eller foreslå en rettelse →