Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
Force-Velocity Profile/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

Force-Velocity Profile

The force-velocity profile characterizes an individual's mechanical properties across the force-velocity spectrum, revealing whether strength advantage lies in maximal force production or high-velocity power output. Formalized by Samozino and colleagues (2012), the FVP is derived from multiple load-velocity measurements (typically sprint starts, jumps, or push-off movements at various resistances) and mathematically modeled as a linear inverse relationship between force and velocity, anchored by maximal power. Athletes differ markedly in their FVP: some excel at moving heavy loads slowly (force-dominant), while others excel at moving light loads fast (velocity-dominant). Profiling identifies these phenotypes and informs targeted training interventions.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

Force-Velocity Relationship and Power Profiling
Taksonomisk metoderegister · hypothesis-test / sports-science
  • Bampouras, T. M., Comyns, T. M., Daly, D. J., & Deighan, M. A. (2007). Comparison of the Wingate test and an isokinetic anaerobic test in recreationally active children. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(12), 822-825. · URL
  • Samozino, P., Rejc, E., Di Prampero, P. E., Belli, A., & Morin, J. B. (2012). Optimal force-velocity profile for maximal power output in human jumping. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 22(4), 206-212. · URL
  • Jiménez-Reyes, P., González-Badillo, J. J., Cuadrado-Peñafiel, V., López-López, C., Del Ojo-López, J. J., & Herreros de Tejada, S. (2011). Association between sprint acceleration, jumping ability, and maximal strength in female soccer players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(8), 2315-2320. · URL
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Same method family1RM Estimationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCounter-Movement Jumpmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCritical Power (Monod)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketRate of Force Developmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyReactive Strength Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

3 registrerte siteringer, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto