ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineLand-use change simulation / growth management

Urban Growth Boundary Analysis

Urban growth boundary (UGB) analysis uses spatial simulation to design and evaluate containment lines that separate land where urban development is allowed from land to be kept rural. Built on the cellular-automata urban-growth tradition exemplified by Clarke, Hoppen, and Gaydos's self-modifying SLEUTH model, it calibrates how a region urbanizes, then imposes candidate boundaries as hard or soft constraints and simulates land conversion forward in time. By comparing scenarios with and without a boundary, the method estimates how much farmland and open space a UGB would protect, how much it would densify the interior, and whether it would push leapfrog development beyond the line.

Openen in MethodMindBinnenkortToepassen, vergelijken, advies krijgen
Tools & bronnen
Dia's downloaden
Leren & verkennen
VideoBinnenkort

Lees de volledige methode

Alleen voor leden

Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.

Inloggen

Methodenkaart

De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.

Bronnen

  1. Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S., & Gaydos, L. (1997). A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(2), 247–261. DOI: 10.1068/b240247

Deze pagina citeren

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Urban Growth Boundary Analysis (Scenario Simulation of Containment and Land Conversion). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/urban-studies/urban-growth-boundary-analysis

Welke methode?

Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.

Naast elkaar vergelijken

Geciteerd door

ScholarGateUrban Growth Boundary Analysis (Urban Growth Boundary Analysis (Scenario Simulation of Containment and Land Conversion)). Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/urban-studies/urban-growth-boundary-analysis · Gegevensset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026