Support for Political Violence Measure
This measure assesses citizens' willingness to endorse violence against political opponents, a key indicator of democratic fragility. Nathan Kalmoe and Lilliana Mason's research, synthesized in Radical American Partisanship (2022), maps a continuum of violent partisan hostility from wishing harm on the other side to endorsing lethal attacks, using representative surveys and embedded behavioral experiments. Because such attitudes are rare and the items are extreme, the measure has prompted vigorous methodological debate, exemplified by Westwood and colleagues' demonstration that inattentive responding and item design can substantially inflate apparent support, making bias correction central to credible estimates.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Kalmoe, N. P., & Mason, L. (2022). Radical American Partisanship: Mapping Violent Hostility, Its Causes, and the Consequences for Democracy. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226820286
- Westwood, S. J., Grimmer, J., Tyler, M., & Nall, C. (2022). Current Research Overstates American Support for Political Violence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(12), e2116870119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2116870119 ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Support for Partisan Political Violence Measure (Lethal Partisanship Battery). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/political-psychology/support-for-political-violence-scale
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Affective Polarization MeasurementPolitiskā psiholoģija↔ salīdzināt
- Blatant Dehumanization ScalePolitiskā psiholoģija↔ salīdzināt
- Democratic Norms Support MeasurementPolitiskā psiholoģija↔ salīdzināt
Uz to atsaucas
Līdzīgas metodes
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →