Blatant Dehumanization Scale
The Blatant Dehumanization Scale, also called the Ascent of Man measure, captures the willingness to overtly deny full humanity to an out-group. Developed by Nour Kteily, Emile Bruneau, Adam Waytz, and Sarah Cotterill in 2015, it uses the iconic evolutionary image of a creature progressing from ape to upright human and asks respondents to rate, on a slider from zero to one hundred, how evolved different social groups are. The gap between how human respondents rate their own group and how human they rate an out-group is a strikingly direct, robust predictor of hostility, support for coercive policies, and aggression that goes beyond ordinary dislike.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The Ascent of Man: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence for Blatant Dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 901-931. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000048 ↗
- Kteily, N. S., & Bruneau, E. (2017). Backlash: The Politics and Real-World Consequences of Minority Group Dehumanization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 87-104. DOI: 10.1177/0146167216675334 ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Blatant Dehumanization Scale (Ascent of Man Measure). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/political-psychology/blatant-dehumanization-scale
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Anti-Immigrant Prejudice ScalePolitiskā psiholoģija↔ salīdzināt
- Intergroup Threat ScalePolitiskā psiholoģija↔ salīdzināt
- Support for Political Violence MeasurePolitiskā psiholoģija↔ salīdzināt
Uz to atsaucas
Līdzīgas metodes
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →