Sibling Fixed-Effects Design
The sibling fixed-effects, or sibling-comparison, design controls for everything that siblings share by construction. Genes (on average half), parents, household income, neighborhood, schooling, and family culture are differenced out when you compare brothers or sisters who differ in an exposure, so the residual within-family association is purged of all confounders common to the family. D'Onofrio, Lahey, Turkheimer, and Lichtenstein championed these family-based quasi-experiments as a way to integrate genetic and social-science research by rigorously testing competing causal hypotheses. Frisell and colleagues, however, gave the design its essential warning label: precisely because shared confounding is removed, the within-family estimate is unusually vulnerable to the confounders siblings do not share and to attenuation from measurement error. The design is powerful but double-edged.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Frisell, T., Oberg, S., Kuja-Halkola, R., & Sjolander, A. (2012). Sibling Comparison Designs: Bias From Non-Shared Confounders and Measurement Error. Epidemiology, 23(5), 713-720. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31825fa230 ↗
- D'Onofrio, B. M., Lahey, B. B., Turkheimer, E., & Lichtenstein, P. (2013). Critical Need for Family-Based, Quasi-Experimental Designs in Integrating Genetic and Social Science Research. American Journal of Public Health, 103(S1), S46-S55. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301252 ↗
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Sibling-Comparison (Within-Family Fixed-Effects) Design for Shared Familial Confounding. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/social-epidemiology/sibling-fixed-effects-design
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Chains-of-Risk ModelSocial Epidemiology↔ 비교
- E-Value Sensitivity AnalysisSocial Epidemiology↔ 비교
- Life-Course EpidemiologySocial Epidemiology↔ 비교
- Negative Control Outcome DesignSocial Epidemiology↔ 비교