Most Different Systems Design
The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 9780471701422
- Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. DOI: 10.1177/1065912907313077 ↗
- Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521676564
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Most Different Systems Design (Comparative Method of Agreement). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/political-science/most-different-systems-design
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Most Similar Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ 비교
- 과정 추적(Process Tracing)심리측정학↔ 비교
- Qualitative Comparative AnalysisPolitical Science↔ 비교