Semi-Quantitative Risk Matrix Analysis
Semi-quantitative risk matrix analysis rates each risk on ordinal likelihood and consequence scales and combines the two in a grid to assign a risk level that drives prioritization. It is the workhorse of practical risk management: ISO/IEC 31010 lists the consequence-likelihood matrix among its standard techniques precisely because it lets analysts compare many disparate risks quickly without the data demands of a full quantitative model. The 'semi-quantitative' label captures its hybrid character — ordinal categories such as 'rare' or 'catastrophic' are anchored to rough numeric bands, giving more discipline than a purely verbal judgment but far less than a probabilistic calculation. The method's popularity is matched by sharp critique: L. A. Cox's 2008 analysis in Risk Analysis showed that poorly designed matrices can rank risks incorrectly, compress very different risks into the same cell, and even perform worse than random, making careful scale design and consistency checks essential rather than optional.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- International Organization for Standardization. (2019). IEC 31010:2019 Risk management — Risk assessment techniques. ISO/IEC, Geneva. link ↗
- Cox, L. A. (2008). What's Wrong with Risk Matrices? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497-512. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x ↗
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Semi-Quantitative Risk Matrix Analysis (Consequence-Likelihood Rating). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/disaster-studies/semi-quantitative-risk-matrix
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Bow-Tie Risk AnalysisDisaster Studies↔ 비교
- Multi-Hazard Risk AssessmentDisaster Studies↔ 비교
- Preliminary Hazard AnalysisDisaster Studies↔ 비교