방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 꼬리 위험 측정 지표 (기대 손실, 스펙트럼, 익스펙타일)× | GARCH 모형 (변동성 예측)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 재무학 | 계량경제학 |
| 계열 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1999 | 1986 |
| 창시자≠ | Artzner, Delbaen, Eber & Heath (coherent risk axioms); Acerbi & Tasche (Expected Shortfall) | Tim Bollerslev |
| 유형≠ | Coherent tail risk measure | Conditional volatility model |
| 원전≠ | Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228. DOI ↗ | Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | expected shortfall, conditional value at risk, CVaR, spectral risk measure | GARCH, GARCH(1,1), conditional volatility model, GARCH Modeli (Oynaklık Tahmini) |
| 관련 | 5 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Tail risk measures quantify the loss distribution beyond Value-at-Risk (VaR). Expected Shortfall — the expected loss given that VaR is exceeded — is the leading coherent risk measure, formalised by Artzner, Delbaen, Eber and Heath (1999) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002). Spectral and expectile-based measures generalise it. | The Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model, introduced by Tim Bollerslev in 1986, models the time-varying conditional variance of a financial time series. It captures volatility clustering and the ARCH effect, and is the standard tool for estimating risk and volatility in return series. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|