방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 리스크 패리티 (동일 위험 기여) 포트폴리오 모형× | 꼬리 위험 측정 지표 (기대 손실, 스펙트럼, 익스펙타일)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 재무학 | 재무학 |
| 계열 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2010 | 1999 |
| 창시자≠ | Maillard, Roncalli & Teïletche (2010); popularised by Qian (2005) and Bridgewater All Weather | Artzner, Delbaen, Eber & Heath (coherent risk axioms); Acerbi & Tasche (Expected Shortfall) |
| 유형≠ | Portfolio weighting model (risk budgeting) | Coherent tail risk measure |
| 원전≠ | Maillard, S., Roncalli, T. & Teïletche, J. (2010). The Properties of Equally Weighted Risk Contribution Portfolios. Journal of Portfolio Management, 36(4), 60–70. DOI ↗ | Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | equal risk contribution, ERC portfolio, risk budgeting, All Weather strategy | expected shortfall, conditional value at risk, CVaR, spectral risk measure |
| 관련≠ | 3 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Risk parity is a portfolio weighting model, formalised by Maillard, Roncalli and Teïletche (2010), in which every asset contributes an equal share of the total portfolio risk. It needs only the covariance (risk) structure of the assets and no forecast of expected returns, and it underpins Bridgewater's All Weather strategy. | Tail risk measures quantify the loss distribution beyond Value-at-Risk (VaR). Expected Shortfall — the expected loss given that VaR is exceeded — is the leading coherent risk measure, formalised by Artzner, Delbaen, Eber and Heath (1999) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002). Spectral and expectile-based measures generalise it. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|