ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

질적 연구에서의 성찰성×Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research×
분야질적 연구질적 연구
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도19901985
창시자Anthony Giddens and Pierre BourdieuYvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
유형ConceptFramework
원전Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314
별칭reflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practicetrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmability
관련44
요약Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 4 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Reflexivity in Qualitative Research · Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare