방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 비선형 차분 GMM× | 인과 추론을 위한 도구 변수(IV) 방법× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 계량경제학 | 보건경제학 |
| 계열≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1991–2010 | 1990s (modern applications) |
| 창시자≠ | Wooldridge; building on Arellano and Bond (1991) | Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory |
| 유형≠ | Nonlinear panel estimator | Method |
| 원전≠ | Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262232586 | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | nonlinear diff-GMM, nonlinear Arellano-Bond GMM, first-difference nonlinear GMM, NL-GMM | IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 요약≠ | Nonlinear Difference GMM extends the Arellano-Bond difference GMM estimator to models where the structural relationship between the outcome and its predictors is inherently nonlinear. By first-differencing to eliminate individual fixed effects and then applying GMM moment conditions with lagged levels as instruments, it consistently estimates parameters in dynamic panel settings without requiring a linear functional form. | Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|