방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 이질적 처리 효과 도구 변수 (HTE-IV)× | 인과 추론을 위한 도구 변수(IV) 방법× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 인과추론 | 보건경제학 |
| 계열≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1994 | 1990s (modern applications) |
| 창시자≠ | Imbens & Angrist | Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory |
| 유형≠ | Causal inference / IV with effect heterogeneity | Method |
| 원전≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | HTE-IV, LATE estimator, IV with effect heterogeneity, local average treatment effect IV | IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation |
| 관련≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 요약≠ | Heterogeneous treatment effect IV applies instrumental variables estimation while explicitly acknowledging and modelling that the treatment effect differs across units. Rather than recovering a single average effect, it focuses on the Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) — the causal effect for compliers, the subpopulation whose treatment status is actually shifted by the instrument — and extends analysis to variation in that effect across observed subgroups. | Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|