방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Diebold-Mariano Test× | Pesaran-Timmermann 방향 예측 정확도 검정× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 계량경제학 | 계량경제학 |
| 계열 | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1995 | 1992 |
| 창시자≠ | Francis Diebold & Roberto Mariano | M. Hashem Pesaran & Allan Timmermann |
| 유형≠ | Non-parametric forecast comparison test | Nonparametric one-sided test |
| 원전≠ | Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(3), 253–263. DOI ↗ | Pesaran, M. H., & Timmermann, A. (1992). A simple nonparametric test of predictive performance. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(4), 461–465. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | DM Test, Test of Equal Forecast Accuracy, Diebold-Mariano Forecast Comparison Test, Tahmin Doğruluğu Eşitliği Testi | PT Test, Directional Accuracy Test, Nonparametric Predictive Performance Test, Pesaran-Timmermann Yön Testi |
| 관련 | 3 | 3 |
| 요약≠ | The Diebold-Mariano (DM) test, introduced by Diebold and Mariano in 1995, is a widely used non-parametric procedure for formally comparing the predictive accuracy of two competing forecasting models. It evaluates whether the difference in forecast errors between two models is statistically significant, without requiring nested models or specific distributional assumptions about the forecasts, making it broadly applicable across economics, finance, and time-series analysis. | Introduced by Pesaran and Timmermann (1992), the PT test is a nonparametric procedure that evaluates whether a forecasting model correctly predicts the direction (sign) of a target variable more often than would be expected by chance. It is widely used in financial econometrics and macroeconomic forecasting to assess the practical utility of a model beyond simple error metrics, particularly when the economic cost of getting the direction wrong is high. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|