방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 교육과정 분석× | 교육적 실천 연구× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 현장 조사법 | 현장 조사법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1949 (Tyler); 1980s–2000s (Posner's analytic framework) | 1940s (Lewin); educational context developed 1970s–1980s |
| 창시자≠ | George J. Posner (systematic framework); Ralph Tyler (foundational rationale) | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations); Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott (educational adaptation) |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative / mixed document analysis | Participatory qualitative research design |
| 원전≠ | Posner, G. J. (2004). Analyzing the Curriculum (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0072823899 | Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335096190 |
| 별칭 | curriculum evaluation, curriculum review, syllabus analysis, curriculum appraisal | EAR, practitioner research, teacher action research, classroom action research |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Curriculum analysis is a systematic research method for examining the content, structure, goals, and underlying assumptions of educational curricula — including written syllabi, textbooks, lesson plans, and policy documents. By mapping what is taught, how it is sequenced, and what values are embedded, researchers and educators can evaluate alignment with learning objectives, identify gaps or biases, and guide curriculum reform across all levels of education. | Educational action research is a cyclical, practitioner-led inquiry method in which educators systematically investigate a problem or opportunity in their own classroom or school, implement a change, observe its effects, and reflect on findings to guide the next cycle. Rooted in Kurt Lewin's action research framework and developed for educational contexts by Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott, it bridges the gap between educational theory and classroom practice by making teachers agents of rigorous inquiry. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|