ScholarGate
アシスタント
Process / pipelineStrategic management / strategic foresight

Cross-Impact Analysis

Cross-impact analysis is a forecasting technique that models how a set of possible future events influence one another, so that forecasts account for the fact that real events are interdependent rather than isolated. Theodore Gordon and H. Hayward introduced the cross-impact matrix method in their 1968 Futures paper, motivated by the observation that judgmental forecasts such as Delphi estimate the likelihood of each event separately and ignore that the occurrence of one event can sharply raise or lower the odds of others. Olaf Helmer's 1977 work refined the approach, distinguishing the original correlational formulation from a causal cross-impact model and addressing the internal-consistency problems that plagued early matrices. The method specifies prior probabilities for events and conditional 'cross-impact' probabilities between them, then simulates the system to produce internally consistent joint outcomes and revised probabilities.

MethodMindで開く近日公開適用、比較、ガイダンスの取得
ツールとリソース
スライドをダウンロード
学習と探索
動画近日公開

手法の全文を読む

会員限定

無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。

ログイン

手法マップ

関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。

出典

  1. Gordon, T. J., & Hayward, H. (1968). Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting. Futures, 1(2), 100-116. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-3287(68)80003-5
  2. Helmer, O. (1977). Problems in futures research: Delphi and causal cross-impact analysis. Futures, 9(1), 17-31. DOI: 10.1016/0016-3287(77)90049-0

このページの引用方法

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Cross-Impact Analysis (Conditional-Probability Modeling of Interacting Future Events). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/strategic-management/cross-impact-analysis

どの手法を選ぶ?

この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。

並べて比較する

この手法を参照する項目

ScholarGateCross-Impact Analysis (Cross-Impact Analysis (Conditional-Probability Modeling of Interacting Future Events)). 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/strategic-management/cross-impact-analysis · データセット: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026