Configurational Strategy Analysis (fsQCA)
Configurational strategy analysis applies fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to strategy questions, asking not which single variable drives an outcome but which combinations of conditions together produce it. The method rests on Charles Ragin's set-theoretic framework, fully developed in his 2008 book Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, which treats causes as set-membership relations and uses Boolean logic to find the configurations of conditions that are sufficient for an outcome. Peer Fiss's 2011 Academy of Management Journal article brought the approach into mainstream strategy and organization research, showing how fuzzy sets can express organizational typologies and introducing the distinction between core and peripheral conditions. The defining premises are equifinality - several different recipes can lead to the same outcome - and causal asymmetry - the conditions for success are not the mirror image of those for failure.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226702759
- Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Configurational Strategy Analysis (Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis for Strategy). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/strategic-management/fsqca-configurational-strategy
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Cross-Impact Analysis経営戦略論↔ 比較
- Disruptive Innovation Analysis経営戦略論↔ 比較
- Dynamic Capabilities Measurement経営戦略論↔ 比較
- Porter's Five Forces Industry Analysis経営戦略論↔ 比較