Cross-Impact Balance Analysis
Cross-Impact Balance (CIB) analysis is a semi-quantitative foresight method that turns a panel of qualitative expert judgments into a small set of internally consistent scenarios. Introduced by Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle in 2006, CIB describes a system as a set of descriptors, each of which can take one of several discrete future states, and asks experts to judge, pairwise, how strongly each state promotes or restricts every other state. These judgments form a cross-impact matrix; a balance algorithm then searches the combinatorial space of state combinations for configurations in which every descriptor's chosen state is the one most strongly supported by all the others. These self-consistent combinations are the scenarios. CIB has become a standard tool for building qualitative socio-technical scenarios, including the shared socio-economic pathways used in climate research.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Weimer-Jehle, W. (2006). Cross-impact balances: A system-theoretical approach to cross-impact analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(4), 334-361. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.005 ↗
- Schweizer, V. J., & Kriegler, E. (2012). Improving environmental change research with systematic techniques for qualitative scenarios. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4), 044011. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044011 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Cross-Impact Balance (CIB) Analysis for Internally Consistent Scenario Construction. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/futures-foresight-studies/cross-impact-balance-analysis
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Cross-Impact Matrix MethodFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比較
- Field Anomaly RelaxationFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比較
- General Morphological AnalysisFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比較
- Intuitive Logics Scenario PlanningFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比較