Web Controversy Analysis
Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558 ↗
- Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655-686. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915574602 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Web-Based Controversy Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis
どの手法を選ぶ？
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ 比較
- Controversy MappingScience Technology Studies↔ 比較
- Digital MethodsScience Technology Studies↔ 比較
- Issue MappingScience Technology Studies↔ 比較